Friday, January 18, 2013

MLK Day: It’s Not About Race

On Monday January 21 the nation will be celebrating Martin Luther King Day. I want to make a few brief remarks about what Martin Luther King means to me.

Leaving aside that many people are celebrating little more than getting a day off, which I am all in favor of, I think there is a disconnect between what the nation celebrates on Martin Luther King Day and what Martin Luther King himself stood for. When we celebrate Martin Luther King Day we generally focus on race relations and the progress that has been made and still needs to be made in that area in the United States.

And it is true that there has been a lot of progress made there, and that is certainly something to celebrate. But in our secular culture what gets overlooked is that the man we normally call Dr. King was also, and primarily, Rev. King. Martin Luther King, Jr., was an ordained minister in the Baptist Church, and it was in that role that he conducted his public life. In other words, when King spoke, he spoke as a preacher, not as an academic or a political leader.

Another way to get at the point I am trying to make here is by noticing that we generally celebrate the man by saying that he was a great black leader. But the reality is that he was a great leader who was black. Martin Luther King's work in seeking justice was not limited to black people. On many occasions Martin Luther King publicly stated that the focus of his work was not to serve black people but to serve all people, particularly those who were poor and without a voice.

And we can hear the echo of this in his most famous speech, that we know as the "I have a dream" speech, where he says,

When we allow freedom to ring... we will be able to speed up the day when all of God's children [emphasis mine], black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the old negro spiritual, "Free at last! Free at Last! Thank God Almighty we are free at last!"

Let me share with you some of my own personal journey. I was raised in the South and although I wasn't raised to be particularly racist, racism was definitely a part of that culture. It wasn't until I was in my twenties and I read a biography of Martin Luther King that I realized the incredible stupidity of race prejudice and segregation. It was through the really courageous efforts of King and those who followed his leadership, both black and not black, that the nation woke up to the destructiveness of its racism and historically declared it wrong. On a personal level I came to see that many of the things I had taken for granted when I was growing up were also wrong and that I needed to change my attitude about a lot of things especially regarding race.

But more than that what I have come to realize is that what drove King was not just the particular evils of American racism. Yes, of course that was a situation that cried out for justice. But it was a situation that fell under a bigger umbrella of God's over-arching passion for justice.

God's passion for justice is not something that came to the forefront in 1950s America. It is recorded in the first pages of Bible in the Book of Genesis and it is a constant throughout the Bible: Old and New Testaments. God has never not been passionate about justice. God’s word is filled with his demand that his people demonstrate justice in their personal lives and in their dealing with all others, including strangers and foreigners, Even enemies.

Now one of the things that I have been accused of in terms of my understanding of what it means to be a follower of Jesus is that I am too radical. I remember sitting in a men's Bible study and mentioning that something Jesus said about giving to the poor had to be taken seriously and one of the other members told me, "Well you can't think like that." What this man was saying to me was that that's too radical. It’s too radical to think that Jesus really meant that I must love and forgive and be willing to die for others, even my enemies, that I must give to the poor until it hurts, that I must be willing to give up all material possessions and all human relationships to follow him. And I agree that these and many other of Jesus’ commandments demand a radical response.

But not too radical. If I am Jesus’ disciple, that means I want to look like him. I must be willing to do what he did. And the things he did were so radical, such a threat to the status quo, that he had to be done away with by the powers of the age. If I am his follower, practically everything I do will be radical, but it cannot possibly be too radical.

It's pretty easy on the one hand to pick and choose the parts of Jesus' teachings that inspire us and don't seem too difficult. But on the other hand I think we all just want to ignore the teachings that are hard. We want a spiritual cafeteria: I'll take the fried chicken and the apple pie. I'm not that interested in the broccoli, and I hate lima beans. But Jesus is like my mom when I was little. I either eat everything on my plate, or nothing.

Martin Luther King came to be one of the Christian leaders I really admire. His life inspires me. Certainly he was a sinner. He made a lot of mistakes in his personal and public life that I wouldn't want to make, or I wouldn’t want to be caught making, and these are well documented. They are often pointed to in an attempt to discredit the man. I think one of the reasons we still collectively consider him great is that in spite of his flaws he remained true to his calling and in the end he gave his life for his convictions. Who of us could be counted sinless under the scrutiny he had to endure? Who among us could be considered sinless at all?

The foundation of the Christian faith is not that God uses great people but that God uses not so great people to do great things. Moses was a murderer. David was an adulterer and a murderer. Jesus’ disciples were dull and petty and fought over who would be the greatest in the kingdom of heaven. Peter denied him. Paul persecuted him. The lesson of the Bible seems to be that greatness in God’s eyes does not come from ourselves and what we are but from what God is able to make us and accomplish through us.

There are a lot of things about Reverend King that I don’t want. I do not aspire to be great in the eyes of men. I don't want the nation getting the day off on the first Monday after my birthday every year. I don't want to be famous.

But I do want to be like him in other ways that I think matter more. I want to be faithful to my calling, as God makes it more and more clear to me. I want to have the courage to stand for God's character of Justice, Righteousness, and Love, even when it is not popular, even when it is dangerous. I want to be willing to die for the gospel.

So in response to anyone who would accuse me of being too radical or too extreme, I want to end with a quote by King from his famous “Letter from a Birmingham Jail”:

…the question is not whether we will be extremist but what kind of extremist will we be. Will we be extremists for hate or will we be extremists for love? Will we be extremists for the preservation of injustice--or will we be extremists for the cause of justice? In that dramatic scene on Calvary's hill, three men were crucified. We must not forget that all three were crucified for the same crime--the crime of extremism. Two were extremists for immorality, and thusly fell below their environment. The other, Jesus Christ, was an extremist for love, truth and goodness, and thereby rose above his environment.

I want to be counted as an extremist for love. Amen.

Friday, January 11, 2013

Perspective

Everyone’s talking about how to prevent violence. Astonishingly, the discussion centers on what to do about weapons. If we really want to prevent more violence we need to stop fearing each other and start loving each other. We don’t need better laws we need better hearts. You may think this is a mushy headed idea but what Gandhi called ahimsa and MLK called agape has proven to be the most potent force for good. It has toppled evil empires. On the other hand, responding to the threat of violence with the threat of violence is a surrender to fear. It says to the evil ones, “Your way is right.” So, actually, if you are saying that more weapons will lead to less violence, I am afraid you are the crazy one.

Monday, December 24, 2012

Some Reflections on Christmas Eve 2012, After the World Didn’t End in Apocalypse at the Hands of Pagan Prophecy

I am blessed to have a number of friends who do not profess to be Christians. That may seem like an odd thing to observe for a Presbyterian Minister but I recall a while back hearing a sermon where the preacher commented that for most people within two years of becoming Christian all of their friends are Christians. This might be good for spiritual growth and community and fellowship, but I think it may make evangelism difficult. Because of the generalized disdain (and sometimes outright hostility) our culture has for “Christians,” most Christians would rather keep their affiliation quiet. It’s a normal reaction, but it really makes it hard to make disciples. Let’s not forget that the last thing Jesus commanded his followers was to make disciples. (Mt. 28:19-20; Acts 1:8).

Now I think our society has good cause to be suspicious of Christians. Inside our fortress church we talk to each other about the depths of the Father’s love manifest in Jesus Christ. But outside the fortress what do Christians profess? Most try to fade chameleon-like into their surroundings and unless you happen to have seen one at church you wouldn’t guess they were followers of Jesus. You can’t tell the difference between them and anyone else. And if we do happen to see each other on the street, it is with great trepidation and embarrassment. I heard a funny joke once: Catholics don’t recognize the Mormons, Protestants don’t recognize the Pope, and two Baptists don’t recognize each other in a liquor store. We, maybe it wasn’t that funny after all.

Then there is a kind of hybrid Christian who tries to identify both with Jesus and the culture simultaneously. These are the ones who drive around in Humvees with Jesus bumper stickers, and indulge in every excess of society, but have convinced themselves that they are living “godly” lives. They attend church regularly, raise their kids in the church, probably tithe, maybe are even involved in service activities and small group ministry. I think it is also mainly this group who seeks to identify Jesus and his kingdom with man-made institutions such as political parties, or even nations. But they mistake prosperity and right standing before their peers for intimacy with Jesus. I once saw an SUV with a license plate that said “HIS GIFT.” I wondered what it would be like to have a God who gave away cars. For these, I am afraid Jesus is only the means to the end of middle class respectability.

Finally there are those who I believe are the worst kinds of Christians because they are the most righteous. They are the ones who make nuisances out of themselves by going around quoting scripture to condemn their neighbors to hell. They are certain that they are saved and everyone who does not believe as they do are not. There cannot be any better example of this kind of Christian than the Pharisee who self-righteously condemns the sinner standing near, saying, “God, I thank you that I am not like other men, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even like this tax collector,” (Luke 18:11 ESV).and then cataloguing his supposed righteous acts. Jesus condemns this Pharisee in no uncertain terms, not because of his righteousness, but because of his hypocrisy. He puts his trust in his own behavior, rather than in God’s mercy, and because of that he walks away unchanged, untouched, and unjustified.

At the farthest end of the spectrum of this kind of “Christian” are the Koran-burning Terry Joneses and the hate-filled Westboro Baptists. Few who truly know the true gospel of Jesus condone their chicanery. But they are vocal enough to catch the attention of the media, who are only too happy to associate them with all Christians in the public eye. And don’t get me wrong, they are the most extreme, but every time I even silently condemn any of my brothers or sisters to hell I am the same as they are, no matter how convinced I may be of the depths of their sin.

Well in the last few paragraphs I’ve condemned most of my brothers and sisters who profess the name of Jesus, so doesn’t that make me just like the Pharisee? And I have to answer yes; I too, am a sinner and a hypocrite. It’s unavoidable, really. That is the nature of the world. I am not proud of it, nor do I excuse it. The best that my own understanding and effort can come up with is far short of the perfection required to be justified before God (Ro. 3:23). And this is the point of Christmas.

So there is a real distance between the Biblical vision of the Christian Church and how our society experiences Christianity. The negative image many have of Christians is well-deserved, even if it is incomplete and misleading. It doesn’t help to indignantly deny that the picture is true. What is needed is a more compelling message.

I started out this little reflection by observing that I feel fortunate to have so many friends who do not profess to be Christians. I didn’t mean that because I don’t like Christians because I do, by and large, like most people, even Christians! But I’m happy to have so many non-Christian friends because it gives me the opportunity to proclaim Jesus to them, not by preaching at them and condemning them to hell, but by living with them and allowing them to see Jesus in real life. Jesus himself calls those who are his, and he is irresistible. (John 10:14-16).

Now that may seem a bold statement and it is and yet it is the promise of the gospel. If I am a follower of Jesus, I have been given a new life in Jesus. As time passes, often in spite of my own will and wishes, the Spirit works in me to form a new person in the likeness of Jesus Christ. Paul writes, “I have been crucified with Christ. It is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me.” (Galatians 2:20 ESV). I am not required to be righteous to be justified, I am justified and so I am commanded to be Jesus. This does not mean that I cease to be human nor that I suddenly cease to sin (or start walking on water and producing wine out of tapwater). Paul declared himself to be the chief of sinners (1 Tim. 1:15), and this is not just false humility. And we are advised that he continued to struggle with sin (2 Cor. 12:7-10), and yet who has been a greater evangelist than Paul?

How am I, a disciple of Jesus, called to make disciples? In the same way that Jesus did: through self-sacrificing love. As Jesus did, I must be willing to give up myself for the benefit of others. Jesus tells us, "A new commandment I give you, that you love one another: just as I have loved you, you also are to love one another. By this all people will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another." (John 13:34-35 ESV). The birth of Christ binds his followers to love as Jesus loves. Christians are called to live in the world, as Jesus did, and to love, as Jesus did, and we are promised that Jesus himself will build his church (Mt. 16:18).

Mother Teresa, highly revered by many both Christian and non-Christian, committed her life to working among the poorest of the poor in India. Many of the people she ministered to were not Christians; they were Hindus or Muslims. But she gave everything she had to their care, regardless, because she said she recognized Jesus in them all – in his most distressing disguise. She once remarked,

How you live your life is proof that you are or not fully His. We cannot condemn or judge or pass words that will hurt people. We don't know in what way God is appearing to that soul and what God is drawing that soul to; therefore, who are we to condemn anybody?

To me this says that I am to love everyone, not just those close to me but those who annoy me and those whose lives I disapprove of and even those who hate me (Mt. 5:44) as Jesus loves. The life of Mother Teresa provides a wonderful example. It is not my task to determine your relationship with God; it is my task to be Jesus to you, no matter what.

So Christmas presents to us the dawning of the glorious good news, but it ought also to bring us to sober reflection on the burden receiving that good news places upon us. It is a burden impossible to bear in humanity. Jesus is born the lowest of the low, the weakest of the weak. Jesus is born in a barn. His gospel is pronounced first to outcasts: to the shepherds, and to me (Luke 2:8-10). “The people who walked in darkness have seen a great light.” (Is. 9:2 ESV). May I, waiting in darkness like the shepherds, greet the light with joy, and proclaim it by self-sacrificing love to all of my brothers and sisters in this broken world. Amen.

Merry Christmas to all. Peace on earth.

--
Grace and Peace.

Rock Presbyterian Church 6910B Miramar Rd. Second Floor, San Diego 92121. Email: rockpresbyterian@gmail.com. Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/SDRockPresbyterianChurch. Telephone: 760-271-7285

Sunday, December 23, 2012

Sermon Notes 12/23, Luke 2:8-14, “Peace on Earth”

Christmas is the affirmation that the well of God's mercy is infinite.

Good morning. Merry Christmas. Grace and peace to you all from God our Father and The Lord Jesus Christ. I am wishing you “the generous overflow of the love of God the Father” and “a state of wholeness with God with no deficiency.” Grace and peace.

This morning we are going to celebrate the birth of our savior by looking at a passage from the Gospel according to Luke. We are looking at Luke Chapter 2 verses 8-14.

8 And there were shepherds living out in the fields nearby, keeping watch over their flocks at night. 9 An angel of the Lord appeared to them, and the glory of the Lord shone around them, and they were terrified. 10 But the angel said to them, “Do not be afraid. I bring you good news that will cause great joy for all the people. 11 Today in the town of David a Savior has been born to you; he is the Messiah, the Lord. 12 This will be a sign to you: You will find a baby wrapped in cloths and lying in a manger.”

13 Suddenly a great company of the heavenly host appeared with the angel, praising God and saying,

14 “Glory to God in the highest heaven, and on earth peace to those on whom his favor rests.” (Luke 2:8-14 NIV).

For the past several weeks in the EM we have been celebrating the season of Advent. Advent is a time at the beginning of the church calendar that reminds us of our need for a savior. It employs the symbolism of waiting in darkness to recall the time between the sin of Adam and Eve and the coming of Jesus. It recalls the depth of our depravity and brings to mind the helplessness and the hopelessness of humanity. But it also reminds us that from the time there was a need for salvation God had a plan for salvation.

Celebrating Advent reminds us that God has made that plan real in the person of Jesus Christ. And so we are today celebrating the greatest gift in all creation. Imagine what it must have been like for these shepherds. I think it is significant that the first announcement of the "Good News" (the gospel) was to them. Shepherds were among the lowest people in the ancient world. They didn't smell very good. Their sheep would destroy pasture land, so people didn't want them on their property. And they were thought of as dangerous and probably dishonest. In many ways the people of the ancient Near East probably thought the same about shepherds as some in our society do about so-called illegal immigrants, or homeless street people.

Now in the story we read today we see these shepherds out in the fields and waiting in darkness. The lowest of the low, lost and outcast, shivering in the cold darkness. And all of a sudden there is a great light, an angel of The Lord announcing "Good News." And let's be clear that we’re not just talking about "good news" like "Good news, I just got a new car!" or, "Good news, I just got a raise!" or even "Good news! I just won the lottery!"

The word used here signifies the announcement of a great victory by an emperor or military commander. So it's not like "good news," it's more like "unbelievably great proclamation of a major victory." And hearing it would have brought on great joy and celebration the these shepherds.

In this story we see this great news being proclaimed to a bunch of outcasts and misfits. And that by itself ought to be comforting to us. Because the Bible, and our experience, makes it clear that, left to our own devices, we too are a bunch of outcasts and misfits. The announcement the angels made was not to the high and mighty, but to the poor, the lonely, the downtrodden, people who were waiting in darkness, maybe not even knowing there would be a light, certainly not expecting that a light would come to them. And it was made to us, too, who also have waited in darkness, with our only hope being the Advent of a divine savior.

Joy, and Peace

Well, what is this great news? "Today in the town of David a Savior has been born to you; he is the Messiah, the Lord." (Luke 2:11 NIV). You will find him in the lowest of the lowly places, the angel said. You will find him in a barn, outcast like you.

The people of Israel had waited centuries for the Messiah. Pretty much everyone believed that God was going to send his Chosen One to make everything right, but nobody really knew how it was going to happen. The scriptures were not clear. Many people expected a great warrior king like David. The shepherds who heard the good news must have been surprised and puzzled to learn that the Messiah had come in the form of the weakest of the weak. But they believed it. Luke tells us that they went to Bethlehem to see if it was really true, and finding that it was true, they immediately told everyone they knew about the good news. And those who heard it were amazed.

Now the scripture tells us that these angels were announcing peace to the earth. I want to just focus briefly on what that means. We have an idea of peace but I think our idea is a little different from what the shepherds or other Jewish people of first century would have heard. When we think of peace, we usually think of the absence of conflict. We are at peace if we are not at war. We are at peace if we are not arguing.

But for the people of the ancient Near East the word would have had a much richer meaning. In the Hebrew language the word and the concept Luke is getting at is “Shalom.” You probably know that a common greeting among Jewish people even now is “Shalom.”

Shalom does mean the absence of conflict, but it also means much more. In the Hebrew language Shalom can be both a verb and a noun. When we think of peace, we think of it as a noun, as a state of being. Hebrew speakers think of it this way too, but there is also an action associated with it.

God's creation was an act of shalom. The world was created in shalom. God created Adam and Eve to live in the Garden of Eden in perfect joyful communion with him. There was no sadness, no pain, no sickness, no suffering. They had no troubles and no need for anything. So that is why one definition of Shalom is “a state of wholeness with God with no deficiency.”

And it also refers to relations between people. So, for example, if two neighbors lived at peace with each other, we could say that they lived in a state of shalom. But if one of the neighbors did something that harmed the other, then that peace would be broken. In order to restore it, the guilty neighbor would have to do some act of restitution. He could pay for the damages, and that would be an act of shalom that wold restore the peace between the two called shalom.

When the angels announced "peace" on the earth, they were announcing both things. God had created the world in shalom. Adam and Eve broke that shalom by disobedience, bringing about all of the brokenness and misery of the world. The problem that Adam and Eve and their descendants, and that includes us, had and have is that we are incapable of repairing what is broken. We do not have enough money to pay for the damages. And that means that a state of conflict and broken relations exists between God and the people that people cannot fix. It was upon them to fix it, because they had broken it, but they could not. And so God and man were in a state of war that could not end.

But because of his great love for us, God himself devised a way to pay the debt. He sent his own son, who was the only one wealthy enough to pay the price, to pay it for us. Christmas is an affirmation that the well of God's mercy is infinite. God himself paid the price that restored the relationship between God and man. God himself did the action of shalom that restored the peace of Shalom. In the words of the ancient hymn, "God and sinners reconciled."

In Christ

Now I'm not going to get into a long theological discussion here but I have to tell you that our old lives were so damaged that the only way we could be restored was by receiving new lives. We had to be born again. And when we were born again, we were born into Christ. The apostle Paul writes to the church at Galatia, "I have been crucified with Christ. It is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me." (Gal. 2:20 ESV). Our life is in Christ.

And if we are reborn into the life of Christ, we are also born into the work of Christ. Christ's work is a mission of shalom. It is a mission to restore our broken world. We, the church, as the Body of Christ, are now entrusted with that mission. It is upon us who are "in Christ" to continue Jesus’ work of restoring the peace between God and man. God chose us to be the coworkers of Jesus in the work of shalom.

How do we do that? In the same way Jesus does it: through self-sacrificing love. As Jesus did, we must be willing to give up ourselves for the benefit of others. Jesus tells us, "A new commandment I give you, that you love one another: just as I have loved you, you also are to love one another. By this all people will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another." (John 13:34-35 ESV). So the birth of Christ binds us to love as Jesus loves.

Let us remember this Christmas Day the great light that burst forth in the darkness and announced the magnificent good news of Jesus’ birth so long ago, the news of peace on earth to the lowest of the low. Let us be grateful for the work of Jesus Christ that gave us new life in “a state of wholeness with God with no deficiency.” And let us identify in the work of Christ our own calling to announce peace on earth, by living lives that reflect his light to everyone.

Merry Christmas. Shalom

--
Grace and Peace.

Rock Presbyterian Church 6910B Miramar Rd. Second Floor, San Diego 92121. Email: rockpresbyterian@gmail.com. Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/SDRockPresbyterianChurch. Telephone: 760-271-7285

Thursday, December 20, 2012

Prayer for the Third Sunday of Advent

This was my closing prayer for my message about joy on the third Sunday of Advent:

Let us pray. Father we bring before you today all of our anguish and all of our fears and all of our brokenness. We bring before you our suffering at how dark the world is. We confess that we have failed to take your Word seriously and so we find ourselves surprised when confronted with unspeakable evil. We confess that we have become lost and confused in our pursuit of joy in things outside of you, in things that can never bring real joy. We confess that we sometimes wonder where you are in all of the tragedy we see around us. And we confess that we have lost sight of our calling to make disciples by shining your light on the world around us. Lord, in the midst of all of this brokenness, we pray that you would remind us of your presence. We ask that you would once again fill this community and each of us individually with your Holy Spirit, not only so that we ourselves might be comforted, but so that we can bring your comfort and your joy to those who are still waiting for you in darkness. We look forward with great anticipation to the Advent of your son Jesus, bursting forth in light upon this gloomy world. We pray that we can recapture the joy of your apostles, and rejoice in such a way that we bring all nations into you in a kingdom of righteousness, justice, and love. And we pray all of these things in the name of your son and our mighty savior Jesus.

And all God's people said...

Thursday, November 22, 2012

For Thanksgiving I Wish You Brokenness

Some Reflections on Thanksgiving Day 2012

First off I have to confess that I am not giving much thanks today. In my mind giving thanks would mean more than a passing glance heavenward and then devoting myself to diversions and over-consumption. Must it not mean that I acknowledge the great mercy I have received by obeying the one I received it from: to share that mercy with my fellows? I think giving thanks would require a reaching out to those who are suffering today: to the homeless, the sick, the brokenhearted, the lonely…. What am I doing of that? I’m just going to do my laundry, get caught up on some work, maybe go for a walk later, and then a small feast with my son. It’s all pretty self-centered actually.

I recently come to understand that there are those who really couldn’t care less about the scholarly and historical aspects of things and so if you are one of these and you happen to be reading you can stop now because I want to take a backward peek at the roots of our Thanksgiving celebration. The holiday of giving thanks has been celebrated in North America since 1621 when a group of the first Puritan settlers in New England celebrated a good harvest. I wonder what that must have been like. It must have been like being on another planet: left to your own devices, surrounded by danger on every side. For them life itself must have seemed miraculous, and so they paused in the midst of hardship to give thanks to God.

As a national holiday Thanksgiving has been celebrated at least since the beginning of the Republic. George Washington issued a proclamation for a national day of Thanksgiving in 1789. The date that we celebrate now, the fourth Thursday in November, was established by Presidential Proclamation of Abraham Lincoln in 1863. That date was approximately four months after the Battle of Gettysburg and the fall of Vicksburg, when the tide of battle in the Civil War appeared to be turning to the favor of the Union.

I admit that I am not a scholar of the Civil War nor really of Thanksgiving, so I don’t know if the battlefield outlook in 1863 had anything to do with Lincoln’s decision to call for a day of Thanksgiving. It would be fully another year and a half before that conflict came to an end. But again, I wonder how the people of the United States then must have experienced Thanksgiving. The future of their Union was far from certain, and there was terrible loss on every side. And yet in the midst of their hardship they stopped to acknowledge the blessings they had received from God.

In the case of the so-called Pilgrims in 1621, they paused to give thanks while pursuing a larger vision. For them it was the “city on a hill,” the demonstration of what the Kingdom of God ought to look like on earth. In the case of Lincoln and the Union in the midst of the Civil War, the people paused to give thanks while looking ahead to a brighter future, albeit a more secular vision than that of the Pilgrims, but still striving to build a better world. In both cases we see people in the midst of hardship devoted to a vision of a better world.

What about us? There is plenty of hardship. There are many things wrong, from violent bloodshed overseas to sickness and hunger within blocks of where we sit reading this. But what is our vision? Do we even have a vision beyond filling our bellies and satisfying our material lusts, not even our needs but “spending money we don’t have to buy things we don’t need to impress people we don’t like”?

How ironic that this morning in my meditation I read these words:

I did not understand duty very well. But how well I understood – precisely because I had come from a life of pleasure – that when a poor person, a suffering person, a sick person, could smile, that was the perfect sign that God existed, and that he was helping the poor person in his or her difficulties.

The social struggle in my day was lively and intense… Everywhere there arose groups professing poverty and preaching poverty in the Church and the renewal of society. But nothing changed, because these people did not change hearts….

No, brothers and sisters, it is not enough to change laws. You have to change hearts. Otherwise, when you have completed the journey of your social labors you shall find yourselves right back at the beginning –only this time it is you who will be the arrogant, the rich, and the exploiters of the poor.

That is why I took the Gospel path. For me the Gospel was the sign of liberation, yes, but of true liberation, the liberation of hearts. This was the thrust that lifted me out of the middle-class spirit, which is present to every age, and is known as selfishness, arrogance, pride, sensuality, idolatry, and slavery. – Carlo Carretto

I think we today may be faced with even greater danger than the Puritans or those who lived in the United States during the Civil War. Because for them the danger was easily recognizable. It was easy to sense a forbidding wilderness. It was easy to see the destruction on the battlefield and to count the dead. But for us, our danger lies precisely in those things we call blessings, made manifest in the means by which we claim to give thanks. It is because our lives are so easy that we are unable to really pause and give thanks to God. We have become Pharisees, so proud of our own accomplishments we can’t see the depths of our depravity and our gigantic need for restoration. And so we go on trying to fill our great emptiness, our need for forgiveness, with too much food, too many things, unsatisfying diversions.

I don’t mean everyone of course. I am looking in the mirror mostly. But if you can see yourself in my mirror then I pray for you on this Thanksgiving Day that you come to really experience your brokenness, so that the Gospel can pierce your heart. I end with the end of the passage quoted above:

You can reproach me, go ahead. But I saw, in the Gospel, a road beyond, a path that transcended all cultures, all human constructs, all civilizations and conventions.

I felt the Gospel to be eternal; I felt politics and culture, including Christian culture, to be in time.

I was made always to go beyond time.

Sunday, November 11, 2012

Sermon Notes 11/11, “The Greatest of All Happy Endings”

Romans 9:1-5, "The Greatest of All Happy Endings"

Most of you who have been here know that we have been working our way slowly through Paul's letter to the Roman Christians. We just finished with Chapter 8 which is one of the most profound books in the Bible. As we considered Chapter 8 we talked about such topics as "the Body of Christ," our new life and new identity in Christ, life in the flesh vs. life in the Spirit, and our adoption into the family of God. We talked about how God is re-creating the world using the church, the Body of Christ, as his instrument, and how we are therefore co-workers with God in bringing about his restored kingdom. We considered the concept of Providence, the idea that God makes everything work for our good and his glory. Finally Paul ends Chapter 8 of Romans with a triumphant conclusion, that because of the work of Jesus Christ, we are more than conquerors; that our eternal glory is assured. Why don't we just read that part again?

37 No, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him who loved us. 38 For I am sure that neither death nor life, nor angels nor rulers, nor things present nor things to come, nor powers, 39 nor height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord. (Romans 8:37-39 ESV).

Just so you know, this kind of writing, where the author expresses himself with heightened emotion, is called a doxology. The root of the word is the Greek word doxa, which means glory. It is used in various places, particularly in Paul's letters, to emphasize how amazing God's grace and love for us is. You may have heard the word before but now you know what it means. So these particular verses in Paul's letter are a kind of a shout for joy at our deliverance. It's like a giant, "Yay God!"

Some of you might remember that several weeks ago I used a clip from the movie "The Return of the King" to illustrate the magnitude of the victory Christ accomplished over the forces of sin and corruption. Do you remember that? The original story of The Lord of the Rings published in three volumes by J.R.R. Tolkien in the 1960s was a story that is motivated at least loosely by the Christian gospel. The universe that Tolkien created mirrors our own experience in that there was an original perfection, a fall from grace, and an ongoing struggle between the forces of darkness and light.

You might not care but I'm going to tell you anyway that the work is not allegorical like the Chronicles of Narnia. You may recall that in C.S. Lewis books the lion Aslan represented Christ, and the witch represented Satan, and each of the characters represented somebody from the Christian Bible. But in The Lord of the Rings the struggle is not depicted in that way. You can't say, well Gandalf represents Jesus, and Frodo represents... well, who does he represent? See what I mean? There isn't a simple correspondence. The story is more generalized.

But in the big picture you can see close association of Tolkien's story and the gospel. In particular, you can clearly see the conflict between light and dark, what we have called the Spirit and the flesh. So anyway, just in case you're not familiar with the story, the number one bad guy, Sauron, who I think you would have to equate with Satan, is trying to get his hands on the one ring of power, because he has concentrated his power in the ring.

I don't think it's a stretch to suggest that the ring represents sin. It seems like a good and desirable thing to whoever has it. But whoever tries to use it becomes trapped by it. The ring destroys their life, but they can't let go of it. They yearn for it desperately, even though it separates them from everything they love. Isn't this what sin feels like?

Anyway the quest of the story is to destroy the evil one's power by destroying this ring, which can only be done by throwing it into the lake of fire in the place it was forged, at Mount Doom in the middle of the evil one's land of Mordor. In the film after about ten hours in real time, at the end of the third movie, we finally come to the place where the character carrying the ring, Frodo, stands at the edge of the lake of fire in Mount Doom and is able to destroy the ring.

He almost flubs it, but in an unexpected plot twist the deed is accomplished by the least likely character Gollum, somebody who has been eaten up with madness by the ring, and who snatches from Frodo by biting off Frodo's finger. In his mad celebration he loses his footing and falls into the lake of fire and is destroyed along with the ring. In the meantime all of the other characters are involved in a hopeless fight against the forces of evil before the gates of Mordor.

It is hopeless because even though they are good, and they fight valiantly, they are utterly incapable of overcoming the magnitude of Sauron's evil. I do think this represents our own struggle against the forces of darkness. No matter how hard we try to resist, without Jesus we are doomed.

So at the climax of the movie we see Frodo, his helper Sam, and Gollum, all hovering at the brink of either destroying the ring once and for all or being utterly consumed by it, bringing about the triumph of evil, And that scene flashes back and forth with the scene of the hopeless battle of the forces of good, Gandalf, Aragorn, the Elves, Hobbits, and Dwarves, versus the overwhelming forces of evil. Their only hope is for the ring to be destroyed.

Then, and this is the part of the movie I showed before, when Gollum falls into the lake of fire and the ring is destroyed, the power that holds together Sauron's evil empire is destroyed. Sauron loses his sway over his evil forces; they cower and run away, and even the mighty towers and walls he has built crumble and are destroyed. In the movie there is really triumphant music, and we as the audience get to thrill to the idea that the deed has been accomplished. Tetelestai, it is finished.

But now when I show this clip I want you to notice what happens. At first there is that real sense of triumph, but then something else happens. Let's watch.

 

What's going on here? These guys were all really stoked, cheering like they are the Padres and they just won the World Series against all odds, but in the end they're all bummed. Why?

The Text

That's right. They're afraid that their friend Frodo has died in the process of destroying the ring. And even though they're happy that the power of Sauron has been forever destroyed, they miss their friend. They think it's a high price to pay. What do you think?

Well, going back to the scripture, we see something very similar happening in Paul's letter to the Romans. Remember we just read Paul's doxology at the end of Chapter 8, it seems as though he couldn't have been any happier. Now at the beginning of Chapter 9 we see Paul is sad all of a sudden. Let's read it and then we'll see what kind of connections we can make.

9 I speak the truth in Christ—I am not lying, my conscience confirms it through the Holy Spirit—2 I have great sorrow and unceasing anguish in my heart. 3 For I could wish that I myself were cursed and cut off from Christ for the sake of my people, those of my own race, 4 the people of Israel. Theirs is the adoption to sonship; theirs the divine glory, the covenants, the receiving of the law, the temple worship and the promises. 5 Theirs are the patriarchs, and from them is traced the human ancestry of the Messiah, who is God over all, forever praised! Amen. (Romans 9:1-5 NIV).

Paul seems to be really sad about his own people the Jews. Let's see if we can figure out what the problem is.

Paul the "Super Jew"

Let's just think for a minute now who Paul is. We know from the Book of Acts that Paul was a very zealous Jew. He was a highly educated scholar and like many of his contemporaries put all of his hope in the promise God had made to Abraham to bring all people to righteousness through him. Paul believed that the Jews were especially blessed, chosen by God to be light to the world. He was passionate about keeping the law of Moses because he saw the law as the means by which the Jews could maintain purity so that they could bring all people to God. That was why when the Church started to grow in Jerusalem he saw it as a great threat and he worked hard to destroy it. In his letter to the Philippians Paul writes about his life before he encountered Christ. He writes,

If someone else thinks they have reasons to put confidence in the flesh, I have more: 5 circumcised on the eighth day, of the people of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of Hebrews; in regard to the law, a Pharisee; 6 as for zeal, persecuting the church; as for righteousness based on the law, faultless.

7 But whatever were gains to me I now consider loss for the sake of Christ. (Phil. 3:4-7 NIV)

Before Paul met Christ, he was a "super Jew." But we just read that after he met Christ, he looked at all that he had once been so proud of about his Jewish identity as loss. In the next verse he uses even stronger language, calling all of this external evidence of being a Jew "garbage." Why do you think he uses such strong language? [because he met Christ].

Because Paul met Christ on the road to Damascus, and he was changed on the inside. Because he was changed on the inside, none of the external things mattered to him any more. When Paul met Jesus on the Road to Damascus he was suddenly able to realize that far from being an enemy of the law, Jesus was in fact what God had been promising all along. He was able to see that all of his efforts to be right with God through religious practice were useless. He came to see that God had fulfilled the law in Christ, so that those who were in Christ could be right with God just through faith in Jesus. And he came to see that the promise God had made to the Abraham wasn't meant for the Jews alone but for everybody.

When his eyes were opened he was able to go back over everything he knew about the law and the prophets and realize that everything in the Bible points to Jesus. So for example Paul could see that the scripture that Mike read this morning, from the Prophet Hosea, was about Jesus. "I will show my love to the one I called 'Not my loved one.' I will say to those called 'Not my people,' 'You are my people,' and they will say, 'You are my God.'" (Hos. 2:23 NIV). Paul's change was profound.

In the book of Acts we read about the scales falling from Paul's eyes so that he was no longer blind. It's very reminiscent of the great hymn "Amazing Grace," I was blind but now I see. Have you ever had that experience where all of a sudden everything makes sense? I know I have. When you suddenly see things in a new light, it gives you a sense of awe and exhilaration. If you're like me you want to run right out and tell everybody what you just discovered. And that's the way it was with Paul. That's why Paul went from being the Church's greatest enemy to the Church's greatest evangelist.

The Stiff Necked People

Well, here's the problem. Paul had seen the light. And some of the Jews had seen the light. But most of the Jews continued to think the way Paul did before he met Christ. So while in Paul's mind the gospel he was preaching came out of God's promise to Israel and was the fulfillment of the law, more and more Jews came to see the church and its gospel as a threat to Judaism. Sadly, the traditional Jews and the Christians grew farther and farther apart. In the first few years after Jesus' resurrection the original Christians had thought of themselves as Jews. But mostly because of the exclusiveness of the way Jewish people thought at the time, they grew apart, and eventually Christianity became a separate religion, as it is today,

Now, in some ways you can't really blame the Jews. Every Jew was educated in the history of the Jews and there were a few events that were fundamental to Jewish identity. One of these events was the story of the Exodus, where God had delivered the descendants of Abraham from slavery in Egypt. It was then that God gave the Jews the law, and made a covenant with them that if they followed the law and lived the life of righteousness, justice, and love that God expects from his people, that they would be blessed in the Promised Land.

Another event was the exile in Babylon. Because the Jews had failed to keep the law, in fact eventually forgetting they even had the law, God had punished the Jewish people by using the Babylonians to burn the temple, destroy Jerusalem, and carry the people into exile. When the Jews were liberated from exile in Babylon and allowed to return to their homeland, their religious leaders had created a way of understanding and obeying the law that sought to ensure that they would never again forget and suffer the consequences.

This was when the Pharisees had built a number of rules on top of the law and in addition to the law that were supposed to keep the people from screwing up. So it is important to remember that what the Pharisees did had a good intention: to make sure that the people didn't violate the law so that they were not punished again. The problem was that by focusing on the rules and regulations the Jews had forgotten the original reason for the law, which was to create a people who lived such blessed lives that they caused all other people to want to live as they did. They were to be light.

But instead of being light, the rules became oppressive. No one could keep them. The Jews themselves were either arrogant and hypocritical, pretending they were obeying the law when they weren't, or burdened with guilt because they knew they couldn't keep the law. And the people who were not Jews were repelled by what they considered to be arrogance and religious silliness.

The Jews were called to be light, but they were not light. And yet many of them clung to the idea that only by careful and strict observance of the law could they come into right relationship with God.

When the scales fell from Paul's eyes he could see the fallacy of Jewish religious understanding. Almost immediately he set out to try to convince everyone he came into contact with that Jesus had provided a way to get right with God without being bogged down by religious nit-picking and without guilt. This proved to be a compelling message for the Gentiles. The idea of being let off the hook was a powerful one that brought huge numbers of Gentiles into the church.

But that same idea was alien to the Jews. The idea could not have been more foreign and threatening. It would be like saying to us, "you don't have to believe in Jesus to be saved. As long as you believe in something and you lead good lives you're going to be right with God." We know that's not true and if someone came in here trying to preach that gospel we would throw them out on their keester. And of course that would be the right thing to do; faith in Jesus is at the foundation of our relationship with God and well supported in scripture.

But the Jews' faith in the law was not supported in scripture. It was a reaction to historical events that tried to add on to the scriptures. The Jewish scholars of the time called it "putting a fence around the law." But nevertheless they believed it as if it was scripture. And because of that when Paul and the Christians preached that you didn't need the law to be saved but only faith in Jesus Christ, most Jews saw it as a threat. And they still do.

So most Jews in Paul's time rejected Christ and saw Christianity as dangerous blasphemy, and many still do. And this is why Paul is so upset in the scripture verses we are looking at today. He knows that Jesus is the fulfillment of everything the Jews believe in, but the Jews of his time can't see it. And so Paul's brother and sister Jews were rejecting for themselves the promises God had brought to the world through them, while the Gentiles were eagerly accepting God's salvation.

And so Paul is bummed. Just like the characters in the clip we just watched. There has been a great victory over sin. But it seems that the cost has been high. It seems to Paul that he had to lose his friend in order to experience freedom from the bondage of sin.

Three concluding observations

I'm almost finished talking about this but I want to make three observations about this scripture that I think we can take away as lessons for ourselves. The first one is, we cannot rely on any external indication for assurance of salvation. What I mean by this is that our relationship with God is not dependent on the way we were raised or by the advantages we may have had in our upbringing and education.

I think in much the same way as the Jews of Paul's time relied on scrupulously keeping the law to assure their right standing with God, many Christians today rely on their relationship to the Church or their religious actions and attitudes to bring themselves to believe that they are right with God. If I go to church every Sunday and put money in the offering basket and try to be good then I must be OK, right?

I mean at least I'm not going out on Friday night and drinking and doing all kinds of sinful things. And I don't swear (well, not too much), or judge others (well, OK I do that but only when they deserve it), or curse others (well, except when I'm driving on the freeway, or when someone insults me or threatens me), or consider myself better than others (but wait, if I think I'm OK and you're lost I guess I do think that). You can see how this kind of thinking isn't really getting us where we want to go, can't you?

But anyway I believe in Jesus, that's an automatic ticket to heaven isn't it? But all of those things just indicate that we are trying to rely on religion for our salvation. We're no different than the Jews who tried to rely on the law for salvation. What they missed is what we are also missing, and that is that salvation is by God's grace alone. You cannot earn God's grace by being religious. In fact, as we see with the Jews of Paul's time and many people today who claim to be religious, our religion can be a barrier to grace. We can think that because we are good we don't need grace, and no one is more lost than someone who thinks that.

So if we cannot earn God's grace, and we cannot come to salvation by any of our own efforts, where does that leave us? Are we at the mercy of a capricious God? We are at God's mercy, but he is not capricious.

How do we know if we are "in Christ"? I think the best indication is not by what you do but by what drives your life. You may be selfish, but when you are selfish do you feel convicted? You may be dishonest, but when you are dishonest does it hurt you on the inside? You may be stingy, but do you feel the suffering of the less fortunate and wish you could do something about it? Do you hear the inner voice that tells you to act more in keeping with the Spirit, more righteous, more generous, more fair? Are you obeying it, even if imperfectly? Do you obey it more and more as time goes on? These are signs that God is moving us out of the world and into his kingdom.

The best way to live like a Christian is to obey the inner voice that calls us to live like Jesus lived, to live lives of righteousness, justice, and love. The best way to live like a Christian is to try to live lives that look like Christ. Of all the things that Christ was, he was not religious, which was shy he was always in trouble with the religious authorities. If you are not sure what a Christian life should look like, read the Sermon on the Mount in Matthew Chapters 5-7.

The second observation is that you cannot substitute yourself for those you care about. Paul writes that he wishes he could substitute his own salvation if it could bring the Jews to salvation. But just by the way he wrote it we know that he knew he couldn't do that. He could pray for the Jews and work to try to bring them understanding, but in the end he knew that their fate was in God's hands.

And so it is with us. Are there people who you are concerned about? Who you wish you could bring the gospel to, but who refuse to listen? Are there people close to you who have rejected Christ, who you fear for their eternal souls? I think we all know people like that, and I think it's natural to wish that we could give up something of ourselves in order to bring them to salvation. The closer they are to us, the more we will be willing to give up.

But while we may sacrifice ourselves for the gospel, and in fact if we are in Christ we will sacrifice ourselves for the gospel, we cannot by our own sacrifice bring anyone to salvation. The work of salvation that needs to be done begins with Jesus.

You may remember the story from John's gospel of Jesus raising Lazarus from the dead. Lazarus was Jesus' friend and he had died and been placed in the tomb. Those who loved Lazarus, his sisters Mary and Martha, prayed to Jesus to do something, but they knew they could do nothing to change the situation. Like Mary and Martha, we may be able to pray outside the tomb of the unrepentant sinner, but that person will not come to life until Jesus calls. "Lazarus, come out!" (John 11:43 NIV). Jesus called in a loud voice.

We cannot bring our friends and loved ones to life, but we can show them the way to life. We can pray outside the tomb, and we can be there to love them when they awaken. Finally, we can look at the moment of despair as only a moment. In Paul's letter he despairs for the Jews in the same way that Frodo's friends in the movie despaired for his safety. But we know that it was only a moment, a single scene in a continuing drama. And if we are familiar with Tolkien's story we know that Frodo was saved by the eagles, and that he lived a long and full life and that eventually he was able to cross over into the undying lands. We know that for all of its moments of uncertainty and sadness, in the end Tolkien's tale had a happy ending.

What we must also believe and rely on is much more so than Tolkien, who in my mind was a great author, God is an even greater author. And he is the ultimate author of happy endings. As we continue to study Romans we will see that Paul will eventually conclude that somehow God will bring the Jews to salvation. Neither he nor we know exactly how.

I think some of you may wonder why I gave this message the title, "The Greatest of All Happy Endings." It doesn't look like there's very much to be happy about in Paul's writing. Paul doesn't point to any happy ending; he ends on a note of despair. But we know that in spite of what our limited vision shows us God has a glorious future in store for us. God's story has a happy ending that has no ending.

So even though we might experience moments of despair, let's always remember that our God is a loving and merciful God, and that he has given all to rescue us from sin and bring us to salvation, and that because of all of that, we can look forward to the greatest of all happy endings.

Let us pray. O my God, you are very near, in my heart and in my life; yet often you do seem far away and my soul faints looking for you: you do lead me through dark places and it seems that you withdraw your presence from me. In the desolate time, when I feel perplexed and forsaken, I think upon the cross of my savior and his dreadful cry, and my faith holds fast in his faith, and despair cannot seize me. Help me to remember the days of vision and sure confidence, guide me to rest my soul in the revelations of yourself that you have given me in times past through all of your prophets and servants, and bring me out of the valley of the dark shadow once more into the light of your presence, through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.